Applying the Tripartite Model

Of all the established theoretical frameworks that can be used in the assessment of the performance and contribution of nursing professors in learning institutions, clearly, the Tripartite Model of annual performance evaluation isрг one of the most developed. On the other hand, it identifies the three areas of engagement as teaching, service, and scholarship. Each of them is crucial in constructing the professional role and influence of nurse educators (Donovan et al., 2020). The purpose of this evaluation is to identify how these components interact and work together cohesively in the context of nursing education and provide reference on best practices for achieving set standards and quality of teaching, service, and research. By making such an analysis, this evaluation will be able to determine the level of success of each of these components and their impact on the issue of faculty tenure and promotion.

Specific Nurse Educator Role

The role for analysis purposes will be the clinical nursing educator in an academic setting as the subject of the nursing faculty position. Clinical nursing teachers supervise students’ clinical learning and assist students in translating knowledge acquired in the classroom into practice while working in care services (Ekiert et al., 2021). They construct theoretical clinical models, secure affiliations for clinical practice with various healthcare organizations, and co-author scholarly publications such as write-ups. Other of these roles include participating in community service and committee work among others. This is in line with the deontology of the tripartite model of nursing where faculty evaluation is expected to include tenure and advancement.

Evaluation of the Teaching, Service, and Scholarship Roles of Clinical Nursing Instructors

LNCTs bear some responsibilities in nursing training; teaching responsibilities, dissemination, and research responsibilities (Ostendorf et al., 2022). High-quality performance in the teaching profession includes the potential to foster critical thinking skills, convert weak theory into practice, and design pedagogy in the clinical area. This may involve using the latest teaching techniques such as the use of simulations to increase the competency and students’ interest.

Teaching other colleagues and students is another way through which service often encourages a friendly and cooperative culture within the academic fraternity (Donovan et al., 2020). Further, expectations concerning scholarship for clinical nursing educators include conducting and implementing research, and publishing and sharing findings about nursing science. Due to these responsibilities that position them in between practice, learning, and research of the nursing profession, these requirements complement clinical nursing teacher roles well.

Plan for Meeting Aspects of the Tripartite Model

Utilizing assessment, knowledge, and experience, clinical nursing teachers can devise a comprehensive plan that will ever-evolving methods, reflective practice, and evidence-based teaching approaches to exhaustively fulfill the teaching dimension of the tripartite model. To enhance the students’ performance and their clinical skills, this plan can include the following, using simulation techniques in their learning, engaging the students during lecture and clinical teaching sessions, and providing them with constructive criticisms (Liu et al., 2022). Clinical nursing teachers can also engage in professional development to enhance their professional practice in nursing education to have an update on the current trends in clinical nursing students’ teaching practice and also relate with other teachers to discuss new teaching strategies.

Service undertaken by clinical nursing educators might include engaging in professional organizations and university committees, for instance, and community-related activities (Marks et al., 2020). This could be participating in curriculum development, engaging the processes of accreditation, helping junior faculty members and students, and participating in healthcare organizations to meet the needs of the healthcare sector. Clinical nursing educators support the aims and the mission of their organization, advance the course and purposes of nursing education, and contribute to the welfare of nursing in general by providing service (Nowicki et al., 2024).

However, there might be certain professional implications for any of the elements that are part of the presented tripartite paradigm. For example, clinical nursing educators may likely miss out on opportunities for their professional growth they may be less capable of contributing to the nursing knowledge base and may be afforded or may afford themselves fewer opportunities for tenure and promotion if the scholarship is not considered (Frederick et al., 2022). Likewise, failure to teach or serve can be costly to students’ learning, lower the standard of the nursing education programs, and lose the credibility and trust of faculty peers and the overall community in one’s academic capacity. Hence, for reaching clinical nursing instructors’ work success or satisfaction it is essential to adopt a comprehensive approach that considers all three components of the tripartite model.

Explanation of Opportunities for Scholarship

Several scholarships in nursing education are similar to the experience of clinical nursing educators. For instance, research on the best practices and teaching strategies in  clinical education teaching methods could be appropriate for peer-reviewed publications. The Internal Public Health and Environmental Research Journal receives many submissions of articles that discuss effective instructional design, as well as assessments of teaching, and learning approaches to education in nursing (Marks et al., 2020). Sharing research data at conferences including the National League for Nursing (NLN) Education Summit also gives engagement with other professionals in the field. These may also include the provision of further information for publication in peer-reviewed publications, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses on clinical teaching and learning about nursing education.

Thus, to attain the position and achieve the goals set by the employer, clinical nursing teachers may require some other certification apart from the knowledge required in nursing education and scholarship. Such credentials must embody advanced education, investigation proficiency, and sundry capabilities augmentation such as Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) or Ph. D. in Nursing Education (Howard et al., 2020). They may also benefit from extending their certification to instructional design or simulation-based education to enhance their ability to implement effective teaching strategies. However, the major components of academic skills include teamwork and communication skills when it comes to interacting with colleagues students, and other stakeholders in academics. It is therefore possible for clinical nursing educators to continue educating themselves and be abreast with the latest trends and practices in nursing education which can facilitate their participation in scholarship and development of the nursing profession.

Qualifications as a Change Agent

It is thus important to determine that the clinical nursing instructor who wants to bring about change in the nursing education system should possess the following qualifications. First of all, a graduate degree provides the basic knowledge and practice needed to construct effective strategies for teaching and to initiate the process of curriculum enhancement (Schaefer et al., 2021). Cultural and social consciousness is also achieved by clinical practice that enables clinical nursing teachers to advocate for changes in nursing education to be made to address changing healthcare needs. In addition, they can engage stakeholders, introduce discussions that are crucial for change, and bring positive changes at the institutions where they teach because they are clinically oriented teachers with leadership ability, inherent talent for communication, and with love for collaboration. Clinical nursing educators can play the role of change in nursing education with the help of these credentials, which will assist in increasing student readiness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this evaluation has shown how it is important for nurse educators in colleges and universities to meet the provisions of the tripartite model which is teaching, service, and scholarship. The three areas may be balanced in such a manner that ensures that clinical nursing teachers can perform their duties in their capacity as leaders, scholars as well as educators within the nursing profession (Nowicki et al., 2024). As highlighted in the proposed model, there are systematic ways through which clinical nursing educators can excel in their positions while ensuring that all appointed clinical nursing education positions deliver quality instruction, substantial service to the community and their profession, and significant contributions to the scholarship of nursing. For clinical nursing educators, they get the opportunity to be change-makers in nursing education thus transforming the way health care is delivered in the future and enhancing patient care.

References

Donovan, C. L., Uhlmann, L. R., & Loxton, N. J. (2020). Strong is the new skinny, but is it ideal?: a test of the tripartite influence model using a new measure of fit-ideal internalization. Body Image, 35, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.09.002

Ekiert, M., Tomaszewski, K. A., & Mlyniec, A. (2021). The differences in viscoelastic properties of subtendons result from the anatomical tripartite structure of the human Achilles tendon ex vivo experimental study and modeling. Acta Biomaterialia, 125, 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.041

Frederick, D. A., Pila, E., Malcarne, V. L., Compte, E. J., Nagata, J. M., Best, C. R., Cook-Cottone, C. P., Brown, T. A., Convertino, L., Crerand, C. E., Parent, M. C., Pennesi, J. L., Perez, M., Rodgers, R. F., Schaefer, L. M., Thompson, J. K., Tylka, T. L., & Murray, S. B. (2022). Demographic predictors of objectification theory and tripartite influence model constructs: The U.S. Body Project I. Body Image, 40, 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.12.012

Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Bureau, J. S. (2020). The tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30-year retrospective and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 88(6), 1268–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12570

Liu, J., Song, Y., An, S., & Dong, C. (2022). How to improve the cooperation mechanism of emergency rescue and optimize the cooperation strategy in China: A Tripartite Evolutionary game model. International Journal of Environmental Research And Public Health, 19(3), 1326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031326

Marks, A. K., Calzada, E., Kiang, L., Pabón Gautier, M. C., Martinez-Fuentes, S., Tuitt, N. R., Ejesi, K., Rogers, L. O., Williams, C. D., & Umaña-Taylor, A. (2020). Applying the lifespan model of ethnic-racial identity: exploring affect, behavior, and cognition to promote well-being. Research in Human Development, 17(2-3), 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2020.1854607

Nowicki, G. P., & Rodgers, R. F. (2024). Pressures to be “shedding for the wedding”: An evaluation of the tripartite influence model of disordered eating and body dissatisfaction among engaged women. Eating Behaviors, 52, 101849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2024.101849

Ostendorf, S., & Brand, M. (2022). Theoretical conceptualization of online privacy-related decision making - Introducing the tripartite self-disclosure decision model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 996512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996512z

Schaefer, L. M., Rodgers, R. F., Thompson, J. K., & Griffiths, S. (2021). A test of the tripartite influence model of disordered eating among men. Body Image, 36, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.009