NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 1: Enhancing Quality and Safety

Enhancing Quality and Safety Improvement

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 1 Nurses play a vital part in enhancing patient quality and safety as they primarily deliver care treatments through medicine administration and monitoring (Alomari et al., 2020). In Arnold Palmer Hospital, patient safety issues related to patient identification crimes are growing considerably, impacting several cases regarding medicine and treatment crimes. Therefore, this assessment will claw into perfecting patient safety issues of identification crimes and incorporate validation-predicated results to promote patient safety and care collaboration.

Factors leading to specific patient safety risks

Case safety is critical to think about while delivering healthcare services in healthcare associations. One of the significant patient safety risks is associated with crimes in patient identification, as they can pose grave risks to cases, analogous to the provision of wrong treatment leading to health deterioration (Bell et al., 2020). Various factors contribute to the onset of patient identification crimes, such as analogous manual data entry crimes, lack of formalized case identification protocols, and deficient or outdated Electronic Health Records (EHRs). Manual data entry of patient information can result in misunderstandings caused by illegible handwriting or typographical errors. These misapprehensions can lead to patient identification crimes (Bell et al., 2020).

Inconsistent identification protocols across multiple healthcare installations can contribute to dilemmas and misapprehensions. Hence, a lack of standardized procedures increases the liability of misidentification. Likewise, deficient or outdated information in EHRs can result in misidentification. This can happen when patient records aren’t regularly streamlined with accurate demographic details. Physicians are also prone to entering wrong-patient order entries, as one study relates that these crimes are for nearly 600,000 cases with wrong order entries in the U.S. (Salmasian et al., 2020).

Evidence-Based Practice Solutions for Patient Identification Errors to Enhance Patient Safety and Diminish Costs

It’s important to address patient identification crimes, as they can lead to poor patient safety and frequency of medicine and treatment crimes. For this purpose, applying validation-predicated practices to avoid patient identification crimes is obligatory. One of these validation-predicated practice results is administering barcode systems within the association. The use of barcoding systems for patient identification has proven to reduce medicine crimes and enhance patient identification rates. One study finds that using barcode medicine administration technology increased patient identification rates from 74 to 100 and reduced medicine crimes (Barakat & Franklin, 2020). Another strategy is integrating biometric technologies analogous to voice or win-tone recognition to promote accurate case identification.

Another new biometric fashion researchers use is iris recognition systems for correct and accurate case identification. This result involves acquiring cases’ iris images, storing the features as iris templates, and matching them with cases’ irises for identification (Anne et al., 2020). Initially, it’s emphasized that sanatorium associations must develop standardized case identification protocols to reduce identification crimes and ameliorate patient safety (Riplinger et al., 2020). These technologies and validation-predicated strategies can potentially increase patient safety by reducing identification crimes. Also, costs can be effectively reduced by preventing costs associated with adverse events and rework due to crimes (Riplinger et al., 2020).

The role of Nurses in Improving Patient Safety and Reducing Costs 

Babysitters have an enormous role in care collaboration to ensure case safety and limit costs, mainly related to risks leading to patient identification crimes. They can ensure adherence to patient identification protocols during various healthcare relations analogous to admissions, medicine administration, and case collection.

For illustration, administering the “two-case identifier” rule, where babysitters constantly use at least two unique identifiers for cases, analogous to names and birth dates, before presiding over specifics, helps reduce the trouble of patient identification crimes during medicine administration (Simamora, 2020). Babysitters can laboriously use technologies analogous to barcoding systems during their quotidian tasks to ensure accurate case identificFor example, checking a patient’s wristbands and medicine barcodes before administering medication helps confirm the patient’s identity and ensures the correct medicine is given, thereby reducing the risk of errors (Owens et al., 2020). 2020).

Babysitters can encourage cases and their family members to partake in their care by vindicating their individualities and information. Case safety is enhanced by educating cases to confirm their names and birthdates during relations with healthcare providers, as empowered cases perform fresh layers of identification (Simamora, 2020). Initially, babysitters can assist quality improvement enterprises in identifying and mitigating patient identification risks within their healthcare settings. For illustration, by participating in root cause analysis following a patient identification error incident, babysitters help assess system weakness and enable the performance of corrective conduct to help prevent similar crimes in the future (Vaismoradi et al., 2020). By coordinating care with applicable stakeholders, babysitters can perform strategies to reduce identification crimes and reduce costs associated with medicine crimes and adverse events due to misemployed patient cases (Simamora, 2020).

Nurses’ Collaboration with Other Stakeholders

Babysitters must coordinate and unite with applicable stakeholders to adequately and rightly address patient identification crimes to enhance patient safety and reduce associated The stakeholders involved in this effort include physicians, pharmacists, health information technology professionals, quality improvement teams, and hospital directors.ectors. Physicians and apothecaries are involved in defining and allocating medicine. Coordinating with them ensures alignment in patient identification protocols and reinforces a shared commitment to delTo achieve this, it is essential to communicate effectively with these stakeholders in order to standardize identification processes during patient challenges and minimize the risks of crimes resulting from misidentification (Alomari et al., 2020).

Megahit professionals are responsible for administering and maintaining EHR systems and technology results. Babysitters must unite with IT officers to ensure the proper functioning of patient identification technologies, such as barcoding systems and biometric tools, to reduce manual crimes and enhance delicacy in patient identification. They will also need to coordinate with quality improvement armies, as their primary thing is to identify and palliate risks to overall safety and quality of care (Alomari et al., 2020).

Babysitters can effectively unite with QI officers to address the root causes of identification crimes and apply demanded procedures and technologies. Sanatorium directors will set programs for the safe and accurate identification of cases and allocate resources to integrate demanded technologies or processes. Babysitters can coordinate with sanatorium leadership to garner support for patient safety enterprises and raise awareness about prevailing causes of identification crimes. Together, they can foster a culture that prioritizes accurate case identification for the safety of cases (Owens et al., 2020).

Conclusion

The case identification crimes at Arnold Palmer Hospital bear the performance of validation-predicated results like barcoding systems, standardized procedures, and biometric technologies. Case identification crimes are encountered due to numerous factors that increase patient safety risks. In this regard, the nurse’s part becomes vital and obligatory to improve patient safety and reduce costs. The role also requires coordinating with other applicable stakeholders to ensure accurate case identification using unique case identifier approaches.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment 1: Enhancing Quality and Safety

Simamora, R. H. (2020). The literacy of patient identification within patient safety programs is enhanced through clinical educator models. Medico-Legal Update, 20(3), 3, 419-422. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Haitham-Abdulhadi-2/publication/350124731_Estimation_of_Some_Genetic_and_Physiological_Variables_of_Iraqi_Desert_Snake_Cerastes_gasperettii_469/links/6052711a458515e834518b9e/Estimation-of-Some-Genetic-and-Physiological-Variables-of-Iraqi-Desert-Snake-Cerastes-gasperettii-469.pdf#page=432 

Vaismoradi, M., Tella, S., A. Logan, P., Khakurel, J., & Vizcaya-Moreno, F. (2020). nurses’ adherence to patient safety principles A methodical review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062028