NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 3 Manuscript for Publication

A manuscript for publication

This handwriting is meant to be sent to the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) and is about how Epic Systems was used as an Electronic Health Record (EHR) action at Sunrise Health Care. Jamia is proud to have published cutting-edge surveys on digital health technologies and health information science. The journal has colored patterns, such as EHR systems, data analysis, and clinical decision support, that are meant to help advance the field by using confirmation-based conclusions and new ways of doing things in medical information science.

The manuscript assesses the efficacy of Epic systems in enhancing workflow efficiency, augmenting patient safety, and addressing quality issues within Sunrise Health. It aligns with the strategic aspirations of the organization and offers suggestions for further advancement to fulfill stakeholder expectations, address challenges, and enhance patient satisfaction.

Evaluation of Epic Systems EHR Use for Interprofessional Stakeholders

The implementation of Epic Systems at Sunrise Health Care signifies a pivotal advancement in enhancing interprofessional collaboration and stakeholder engagement via the utilization of electronic health records (EHRs). Epic is a top EHR platform that aims to make workflows easier, improve patient safety, and raise the overall quality of healthcare (Chishtie et al., 2023). Epic makes it easy for everyone in an interprofessional care platoon to communicate, share data, and plan coordinated care, all of which are necessary for providing high-quality case care.

Epic’s complete case records and decision-support tools make it easier for croakers to handle individual delicacy and plan treatment at Sunrise Health Care (Chishtie et al., 2023). Epic’s integration with clinical guidelines also helps doctors follow evidence-based practices, which leads to better outcomes for patients. Nurses benefit from Epic’s user-friendly interface, which allows for accurate attestation and real-time case monitoring (Jiang et al., 2021). This lowers the risk of crimes and keeps patients safe.

Improving Workflows for Safety and Quality Outcomes

Epic Systems has made a big difference in how things work at Sunrise Health Care, making things safer for patients and better for quality. The platform’s streamlined processes let healthcare workers access complete patient information in real time, which improves communication across the entire care continuum (Jiang et al., 2021). For instance, when a case is moved from the exigency department to an inpatient unit, all of the care platoon members can immediately see the case’s history, lab results, and treatment plans. This cuts down on crimes and makes patients safer.

Epic’s clinical decision support (CDS) tools also help make things safer by giving people warnings, monuments, and clinical guidelines that are based on evidence right in the workflow (Alexiuk et al., 2024). These tools help doctors make smart choices quickly. Epic’s ability to combine decision support, clinical attestation, and order entry also helps with a whole-person approach to patient care and improves communication between interdisciplinary teams (Adeniyi et al., 2024).

Supporting the Strategic Plan of Sunrise Health Care

Sunrise Health Care’s integration of Epic EHR fits well with its strategic plan, which puts patient care, functional effectiveness, and collaboration at the top of the list. Grand supports these claims by giving healthcare providers access to reliable and centralized case data, which helps with clinical issues and patient satisfaction (Johnson, 2024).

Epic also makes things work better by automating routine tasks like attestation, billing, and scheduling, which makes things easier for executives (Wang et al., 2024). This saves money and lets staff focus more on taking care of patients. The system’s ability to work with other health techniques makes it more efficient (Chishty et al., 2023).

Recommendations for Improvement

A lot of suggestions have been made for how to change how Epic EHR is used at Sunrise Health Care. First, everyone involved needs to get ongoing training. Regular training sessions will make sure that staff know how to use Epic’s advanced features, like decision support tools and analytics. This will lead to fewer street crimes and more accurate data (Ali et al., 2023). Also, making the EHR interface fit the needs of different stakeholders can make the user experience better and the workflow more efficient (Sreejith & Sinimole, 2024). To improve patient satisfaction, it is important to improve the tools that Epic uses to get patients involved. Adding more features to the case gate and integrating telehealth services will give cases more control over their health (Janssen et al., 2023).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the implementation of Epic Systems at Sunrise Health Care has greatly improved the organization’s ability to provide effective, safe, and patient-centered care. Epic’s all-in-one platform has made it easier for professionals to work together perfectly, improved individual privacy, and supported decision-making based on evidence through integrated tools and real-time access to data. Epic’s ability to streamline workflows and ease the burden on executives has freed up healthcare providers to focus more on direct case care, which has improved overall functional effectiveness. Epic has also helped with health issues by keeping track of patient data and allowing targeted interventions. To get the most out of Epic, it is best to keep training staff, customize the software for each affiliate, and add more tools for patient engagement.

NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 3 Manuscript for Publication

Carini, E., Villani, L., Pezzullo, A. M., Gentili, A., Barbara, A., Ricciardi, W., & Boccia, S. (2021). The influence of digital case doors on health concerns, system efficiency, and patient stations was assessed through a systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9). https://doi.org/10.2196/26189

Chishtie, J., Sapiro, N., Wiebe, N., Rabatach, L., Lorenzetti, D., Leung, A. A., Rabi, D., Quan, H., & Eastwood, C. A. (2023). Utilization of a comprehensive electronic health record system for a scoping review of healthcare exploration. The Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e51003. https://doi.org/10.2196/51003

Janssen, A., Keep, M., Selvadurai, H., & Shaw, T. (2023). Health professionals’ guests with a case portal before and after launch A qualitative investigation. Health Policy and Technology, 12(3), 100761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100761

Jiang, G., Dhruva, S. S., Chen, J., Schulz, W. L., Doshi, A. A., Noseworthy, P. A., Zhang, S., Yu, Y., Patrick Young, H., Brandt, E., Ervin, K. R., Shah, N. D., Ross, J. S., Coplan, P., & Drozda, J. P. (2021). The feasibility of aggregating real-world data from health information technology systems across multiple centers to evaluate cardiac ablation device concerns. An informatics analysis report that is appropriate for its purpose. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(10), 2241–2250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocab117

NURS FPX 6412 Assessment 3 Manuscript for Publication

Johnson, R. J. (2024). EPIC® and high trustability in healthcare This commentary is grounded in substantiation. Journal of Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 1(4), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2641-5526.jmid-24-4893

Sreejith, R., & Sinimole, K. R. (2024). stoner-centric evaluation of EHR software through NLP-driven disquisition Counteraccusations for product development and stoner experience. Journal of Open Innovation Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100206–100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100206

Trout, K. E., Chen, L.-W., Wilson, F. A., Tak, H. J., & Palm, D. (2022). The study examines the effects of meaningful use and electronic health records on the safety of patients in a sanitarium. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912525

Wang, Z., West, C. P., Vaa Stelling, B. E., Hasan, B., Simha, S., Saadi, S., Firwana, M., Nayfeh, T., Kelly, E., Viola, K. E., Prokop, L. J., & Murad, M. H. (2024). Measuring attestation burden in healthcare. Final specialized detail number, 47.