Locating Credible Databases and Research

Evidence-based practice is essential for delivering high-quality patient care by incorporating research findings into clinical decision-making (Abubaker et al., 2021). Cellulitis, a common bacterial skin infection, requires prompt, effective interventions to prevent complications (Bystritsky, 2021). As a baccalaureate nurse supervising clinical staff, effective communication and collaboration are essential for applying evidence-based practices in nursing scenarios like cellulitis. In this scenario, a newly trained nurse is assigned to a patient with cellulitis but needs more confidence in implementing EBP. This paper explores communication strategies to guide nurses in researching cellulitis, evaluating credible sources, and using recommended databases. These strategies enhance nurses’ confidence and competence in delivering evidence-based care, improving patient outcomes, and fostering professional growth.

Strategies for Promoting Research Based on Diagnoses

It is vital to use impactful communication strategies to inspire nurses to engage in research and adopt practices centered on specific diagnoses (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). Strategic communication interventions significantly boost nurses’ interest in R&D, bridging the gap between research and clinical practice. A study by Manca et al. (2020) found that targeted communication initiatives lead to a marked increase in nurses’ participation in R&D activities. It heightened interest in R&D and fostered innovative thinking and the adoption of evidence-based practices within healthcare settings. To support nurses conducting diagnosis-based research, such as on cellulitis, employing communication strategies tailored to individual personality types can be particularly effective. A study by Zárate & Correa (2023) demonstrated that utilizing frameworks like the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) enhances interactions among healthcare team members, improving intra-team communication and patient interactions. This approach is vital for facilitating diagnosis-oriented research. Research by Mohamed et al. (2024) emphasizes the importance of integrating evidence-based practices and promoting research activities to enhance healthcare outcomes. Using personality-based communication techniques and strategic directions enhances nurses’ research capabilities in cellulitis, improving patient care and fostering professional growth while building competence and teamwork (Terry & Newham, 2020).

Best Places to Complete Research within the Workplace Environment

Optimal locations for conducting research in a healthcare setting include the hospital’s computer lab and the nursing stations, which typically have access to comprehensive online libraries and databases (Ferreira et al., 2023). Resources such as CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library are invaluable for researching cellulitis. These databases provide access to peer-reviewed journals, clinical guidelines, and systematic reviews, offering high-quality evidence on cellulitis treatments, including antibiotic therapy, wound care, and patient management strategies. Utilizing these resources ensures that nurses can find the most current and relevant information to make informed decisions. For example, PubMed offers a vast repository of biomedical literature that can help understand the latest research on cellulitis pathogens and resistance patterns (Ong et al., 2022). The Cochrane Library is particularly useful for accessing systematic reviews that summarize the effectiveness of different interventions. Hospital policy databases and guidelines provide institution-specific protocols that ensure compliance with local standards of care. Routine healthcare data provides valuable information on healthcare utilization, diagnoses, and treatments (Abubaker et al., 2021). Conducting research in dedicated spaces enhances access to essential tools and fosters a collaborative environment, which is crucial for effectively managing cellulitis. Analyzing the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence from these sources is crucial for making well-informed clinical decisions. High-quality evidence supports better patient outcomes, enhances professional competence, and fosters a culture of continuous learning and improvement in healthcare practices.

The Best Online Resource for the Evidence Collection

The following online resources provide extensive knowledge about controlling and preventing cellulitis: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline (via EBSCOhost), DynaMed, and Embase. 

PubMed

This resource is most used due to its extensive, up-to-date, and peer-reviewed content. PubMed is an essential database for accessing biomedical literature, including extensive collections of articles, clinical trials, and reviews. It provides a broad scope of medical information, making it a vital tool for staying up-to-date with the latest research. PubMed is particularly useful for finding peer-reviewed studies on cellulitis, covering aspects like antibiotic therapy, resistance patterns, and clinical management strategies. 

Cochrane Library

The Cochrane Library is ranked second and is highly used for its systematic reviews and high-level evidence. The Cochrane Library offers high-quality systematic reviews and critical appraisals of existing research studies. It also includes comprehensive research summaries and evidence-based healthcare articles. The plain-language summaries simplify complex research findings, making them accessible to a wider audience. It is crucial for healthcare practitioners who need to stay informed about the latest evidence-based practices in cellulitis treatment (Williams et al., 2023). 

Medline (via EBSCOhost)

This resource is ranked third and used for conducting in-depth research on cellulitis due to its comprehensive and broad coverage. Available through EBSCOhost, MEDLINE provides access to various biomedical and life sciences publications covering clinical trials, epidemiology, and biochemistry. It ensures access to a broad spectrum of information on cellulitis (Williams et al., 2023). 

DynaMed

DynaMed is ranked fourth and moderately used for quick reference and clinical decision support. It is a highly regarded clinical reference tool that provides accurate and up-to-date clinical information. It offers comprehensive, evidence-based clinical summaries, decision trees, and drug information, which is particularly useful for making informed decisions about cellulitis treatment (Chuang et al., 2022). 

Embose

 Embase is less used due to its broader focus but is still valuable for comprehensive research (Bystritsky, 2021). Embase features a wide collection of research articles and clinical evidence in biomedical sciences, including journals and publications on human health, diseases, treatments, and medical advancements. Regular updates ensure access to the latest studies, essential for healthcare professionals researching cellulitis. These sources provide healthcare professionals with unique perspectives and a wealth of information, invaluable when seeking evidence for clinical diagnoses and practice issues, particularly for conditions like cellulitis. 

Why are these Resources Credible Evidence-based Resources?

The following resources are excellent for researching cellulitis because they provide comprehensive and evidence-based information. PubMed is an extensive biomedical literature database with peer-reviewed articles and clinical trials focused on cellulitis, ensuring access to the latest scientifically validated information (Bystritsky, 2021). The Cochrane Library is known for its systematic reviews, which are meticulously compiled and offer a high level of evidence crucial for making informed decisions on cellulitis management. Medline provides various biomedical research, presenting diverse cellulitis treatment and prevention perspectives. Embase offers extensive coverage of biomedical research, adding depth to the literature on cellulitis (Williams et al., 2023). DynaMed provides clinical summaries that are evidence-based and regularly updated, ensuring access to the latest best practices for cellulitis care. These sources are selected for their rigorous editorial standards and comprehensive coverage, making them ideal for obtaining reliable evidence for cellulitis diagnosis and treatment.

Conclusion

Cellulitis is a serious health concern that requires prompt identification and efficient management (Chuang et al., 2022). To achieve this, healthcare professionals must communicate and collaborate effectively. Staying current with the latest advancements and therapeutic strategies is crucial, and online and offline resources can be invaluable. These resources include updated clinical guidelines, comprehensive medical databases, and peer-reviewed journals, which provide extensive knowledge on the diagnosis and management of cellulitis. Healthcare staff must be educated on cellulitis management to deliver personalized, high-quality care and stay updated on evolving practices (Williams et al., 2023).

References

Abubaker, N., Abualrub, S., Obeidat, F., & Assmairan, K. (2021). Evidence-based practice beliefs and implementations: A cross-sectional study among undergraduate nursing students. Nursing, 20(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00522-x 

Bystritsky R. J. (2021). Cellulitis. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 35(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2020.10.002 

Chuang, Y. C., Liu, P. Y., Lai, K. L., & Tseng, C. H. (2022). Bilateral lower limbs cellulitis: A narrative review of an overlooked clinical dilemma. International Journal of General Medicine, 15, 5567–5578. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S356852 

Ferreira, D. C., Vieira, I., Pedro, M. I., Caldas, P., & Varela, M. (2023). Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the techniques used for its assessment: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Healthcare, 11(5), 639. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050639 

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: Barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. Nursing, 20(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2 

Mohamed, R. A., Alhujaily, M., Ahmed, F. A., Nouh, W. G., & Almowafy, A. A. (2024). Nurses’ experiences and perspectives regarding evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare context: A qualitative study. Nursing Open, 11(1), e2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2080 

Manca, A., Cugusi, L., Cortegiani, A., Ingoglia, G., Moher, D., & Deriu, F. (2020). Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding. Nursing, m4265. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4265

Ong, B. S., Dotel, R., & Ngian, V. J. J. (2022). Recurrent cellulitis: Who is at risk, and how effective is antibiotic prophylaxis? International Journal of General Medicine, 15, 6561–6572. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S326459 

Terry, L., & Newham, R. (2020). Understanding and applying personality types in healthcare communication. Nursing Standard, 35(7), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2020.e11490

Welsh, J. A., Goberdhan, D. C. I., O’Driscoll, L., Buzas, E. I., Blenkiron, C., Bussolati, B., Cai, H., Di , D., Driedonks, T. A. P., Erdbrügger, U., Falcon, J. M., Fu, Q. L., Hill, A. F., Lenassi, M., Lim, S. K., Mahoney, M. G., Mohanty, S., Möller, A., Nieuwland, R., Ochiya, T., Witwer, K. W. (2024). Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles: From basic to advanced approaches. Journal of Extracellular Vesicles, 13(2), e12404. https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.12404

Williams, O. M., Hamilton, F., & Brindle, R. (2023). The natural history of antibiotic-treated lower limb cellulitis: Analysis of data extracted from a multicenter clinical trial. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 10(10), ofad488. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad488 

Zárate, R., & Correa, J. C. (2023). How good is the Myers-Briggs type indicator for predicting leadership-related behaviors? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 940961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.940961