PSY FPX 6720 Assessment 5 Critical Analysis of Leadership Theories 

Critical Analysis of Leadership Theories

Introduction

The definition of management has evolved over time; the central function is the impact process on a group in its overall objective (Northouse, 2018). Research employees demonstrate a good relationship with the work approach, effectiveness, and management (student, Erdogan, Anand, Liden, and Chaudhary, 2014). Leadership development, often neglected, is critical to organizational effectiveness and optimizes people’s potential to perform in leadership (McColi et al., 2010).

Case Study

Greg Stephens, an employee at United First Federal Bank, faces work-life balance and the effect on effectiveness as a leader. Greg’s experience shows the necessity of leadership type, attention, and well-being in effective leadership.

Leader Ineffectiveness

Greg suffers from a specific leadership shortfall, and he is incompetent at multitasking and neglecting personal needs, which leads to inefficiency and demoralizes the team. Their behavior is a reflection of poor leadership practice and impedes organizational success.

Leadership Theories Compared

Servant and authentic leadership theories provide contrasting views to leadership. While the two leaders appreciate the following conditions, the server is interested in meeting leadership followers’ needs and authentic leadership with the real self-realization and accountability of the leaders.

Effective Leadership

With Greg, the most appropriate is authentic leadership, which emphasizes real self-realization and self-belief. Authentic leadership entails self-scanning for infection, building trust within the team, and promoting work-life balance.

Conclusion

The authentic leadership theory gives us a possible model of effective leadership, emphasizing genuine self-expression and trust establishment. As the organization keeps on evolving, leaders must adapt their leadership so that they can establish trust and generate motivation among their subordinates.

PSY FPX 6720 Assessment 5: Critical Analysis of Leadership Theories

He, D., & Yu, E. (2020). Follower Strengths-Based Leadership and Follower Innovative Behavior: The Roles of Core Self-Evaluations and Psychological Well-Being. Revista De Psicología Del Trabajo Y De Las Organizaciones, 36(2), 103-110. doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.5093/jwop2020a8

Jones, R. J., Woods, S. A., & Zhou, Y. (2021). The Effects of Coachee Personality and Goal Orientation on Performance Improvement Following Coaching: A Controlled Field Experiment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(2), 420-458. doi:10.1111/apps.12218

Kennedy, R. B., & Kennedy, D. A. (2004). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® in Career Counseling. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41(1), 38-44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2004.tb00876.x

Kilburg, R. R., & Donohue, M. D. (2011). Toward a ‘Grand Unifying Theory’ of Leadership: Implications for Consulting Psychology. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63(1), 6-25. doi:10.1037/a0023053

Kleynhans, D. J., Heyns, M. M., & Stander, M. W. (2021). Dynamic Organizational Capabilities: The Role of Authentic Leadership and Trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47, n/a. doi:https://doi-org.library.capella.edu/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1877

PSY FPX 6720 Assessment 5 Critical Analysis of Leadership Theories 

Ling, Q., Liu, F., & Wu, X. (2017). Servant versus Authentic Leadership: Assessing Effectiveness in China’s Hospitality Industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 58(1), 53-68. doi:10.1177/1938965516641515

MacKie, D. (2014). The Effectiveness of Strength-Based Executive Coaching in Enhancing Full-Range Leadership Development: A Controlled Study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66(2), 118-137. doi:10.1037/cpb0000005

Overfield, D. V. (2016). A Comprehensive and Integrated Framework for Developing Leadership Teams. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 68(1), 1-20. doi:10.1037/cpb0000053

Poonamallee, L., PhD. (2021). Leading Virtually with a Human Touch. Leadership Excellence, 38(8), 44-45. Retrieved from http://library.capella.edu/login?qurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proquest.com%2Ftrade-journals%2fLeading-virtually-with-human-touch%2g Docview%2F2563511408%2Fse-2%3 Accountid%3D27965

Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2009). Strengths-Based Leadership: Great Leaders, Teams, and Why People Follow. Gallup Press. Retrieved from fromhttp://common.books24x7.com/book/id_36537/book.asp

Schwartz, T. (2007a). Manage Your Energy, Not Your Time. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 63-73. Retrieved from fromhttp://library.capella.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=26555015&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Schwartz, T. (2007b). Manage Your Energy, Not Your Time. Harvard Business Review, 85(10), 63-73. Retrieved from fromhttp://library.capella.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=26555015&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Turregano, C. (2013). Delegating Effectively: A Leader’s Guide to Getting Things Done. Center for Creative Leadership. Retrieved from fromhttp://common.books24x7.com/book/id_53211/book.asp

VIA Institute on Character. Retrieved from https://www.viacharacter.org/character-strengths-via

Vidyarthi, P. R., Erdogan, B., Anand, S., Liden, R. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2014). One Member, Two Leaders: Extending Leader–Member Exchange Theory to a Dual Leadership Context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 468-483. doi:10.1037/a0035466

Welch, D., Grossaint, K., Reid, K., & Walker, C. (2014). Strengths-Based Leadership Development: Insights from Expert Coaches. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 66(1), 20-37. doi:10.1037/cpb0000002

Wu, L., Tse, E. C., Fu, P., Kwan, H. K., & Liu, J. (2013). The Impact of Servant Leadership on Hotel Employees’ “Servant Behavior.” Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(4), 383-395. doi:10.1177/1938965513482519