PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1

Assessment Overview

PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1: focuses on conserving the integrity of voting by reducing the influence of social and mainstream media on political decision-making. The offer recommends forming an independent expert group to cover media content, ensuring factual delicacy and impartiality during choices. The thing is to promote ethical, fair, and informed voting practices, securing the republic from manipulation and bias. 

What’s Included:

Sample Assessment Paper

Executive Summary

Proposal Title: Improvement of Voting Integrity

Proposal Writer: Madison Ovitt

Proposal Client: John Doe, Town Hall President

Proposal Stakeholders: All voters

Proposal Due Date: 14th June, 2022

Objectives:

It is necessary to preserve the integrity of voting, being a fundamental human right, by safeguarding it from undue external influences. This proposal aims to establish voting regulations, minimizing the role of social and mainstream media, hence encouraging independent voter decision-making (Ovitt, 2022). Research has revealed that social and media influences have a significant impact on political self-expression (Bond et al., 2012). As such, the proposal tries to minimize these influences so that voters can make choices free from undue external pressures.

Proposed Solution:

The idea is to establish an expert group for providing neutral, factual data concerning candidates or subjects. The team will filter and edit content on the media and aim at lifting the level of integrity in voting by diminishing slanted impacts. Mechanisms for accountability, the same way that exists in Germany, will make sponsors and advertising companies liable for honest presentation (Krause, 2015).

Final Deliverable:

The last proposal is to impose strict regulations to control media and social representations during voting and participating in public discourses. It advocates for maintaining objectivity and not influencing others, ensuring fair and ethical behavior (Ovitt, 2022). Such practices have worked elsewhere and are necessary in ensuring well-informed decision-making.

Risks:

Some of the challenges that can undermine the impact of the suggested interventions include the persistence of social influence regardless of media filtering and the risk of people’s own biases interfering with filtering (Ovitt, 2022).

Project Budget/Spending Estimate:

Although no specific budget has been established, financing the group that will filter media is pivotal to the defense of voting integrity. Further analysis will enable budget requirements to be cemented even further as the proposal is established (Ovitt, 2022).

Proposal Priorities:

The foremost priorities are to facilitate fair and impartial voting processes, ensure equal opportunity for everyone to vote, and discourage malicious influence tactics (Ovitt, 2022).

Proposed Guidelines:

Formulating research-driven guidelines is imperative to generate ethical public discourse and media coverage in elections. The guidelines aim to eliminate misinformation and promote fact-based discussion, as per the principles of good governance (Krause, 2015).

PSY FPX 5120 Assessment 1 Participating in Politics: Executive Summary 

Smith, A. (2020, August 28). Cell phones, social media, and the 2014 campaign. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved June 14, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421

References

  • Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
  • Capella University. (n.d.). Retrieved June 13, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
  • Krause, T. (2015). A natural experiment on media attention and public enterprise accountability. Public Organization Review, 15(2), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0270-2
  • Ovitt, M. (2022). Enhancing Voting Integrity. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (Eds.). (1991). Agenda setting: Readings on media, public opinion, and policymaking. Communication textbook series. Hillsdale: Erlbaum https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421

Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1: Identify the core issue—media and social influence on choosers. 

Step 2: Propose a neutral expert group to oversee and corroborate political information. 

Step 3: Develop regulations to ensure veracious and unprejudiced media content. 

Step 4: Assess implicit pitfalls, similar to individual bias or patient media goods. 

Step 5: Establish responsibility mechanisms analogous to Germany’s media system. 

Step 6: Finalize ethical guidelines promoting translucency and fact-grounded discussion. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Integrity Note

Use this example for learning and structure only. Do not submit as your own work.
We are an independent resource and are not affiliated with any university.

Essay-Writing-Service-For-Students-Best-Essay-Writer-Online.png

“I paid the service to write my research paper.” They wrote an excellent paper with a lot of research and correct citations. “Great excellent work!”

Order ID # 00889

BSN - Capella University

Jonathan Nicole

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : BSN, MSN

Jessica Walker

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : MSN, DNP

Denis Peterson

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : DNP, PSY

How it Works

We provide services to registered nurses who are taking classes toward their BSN or MSN degrees.

You cannot copy content of this page

Nursing Papers Help even with a 3-hour deadline!

Get Any Assessment For Free

Verification is required to avoid bots.