NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search

Assessment Overview

NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2:is your first step in creating a substantiation base for doctoral design. Your notes offer a comprehensive overview of the literature regarding the use of cognitive behavioral remedy (CBT) and motivational canvassing ways to treat opioid dependence. The thing is to translate your comprehensive disquisition strategy and findings into a professional document that demonstrates your scholarly moxie. 

What’s Included:

Sample Assessment Paper

 Literature Search

The literature quest for this design aimed to assess the effectiveness of substantiated cognitive behavioral remedy (CBT) and motivational canvassing for cases with opioid dependence. A regular and strategic approach was espoused, exercising several scholarly databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. These databases were named for their responsibility in offering high-quality disquisition in the healthcare and psychology disciplines. The quest was guided by keywords and expressions applicable to the PICOT question, such as opioid dependence, cognitive behavioral remedy, motivational canvassing, client-centered treatment, and readmission rates. Boolean operators analogous to “AND” and “OR” were employed to combine quest terms, while adulterants for peer-reviewed papers and recent publications were used to upgrade results (Hah et al., 2020). This strategy aimed to describe the most material studies that assess the impact of these interventions on reducing readmission rates in cases with opioid dependence. 

Literature Search Strategy

To identify applicable studies, a combination of strategies was employed. Pivotal terms, including Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), analogous to opioid-combined conditions, cognitive behavioral remedy, and motivational interviewing, were used to enhance quest particularity. Also, reviewing reference lists of linked studies helped uncover supplementary resources. This comprehensive approach ensured that studies published in the last five years were included. Fresh criteria concentrated on disquisition involving adult cases with substance use conditions who entered substantiated CBT and motivational canvassing, with readmission rates as an outgrowth. Studies not in English, those involving children, and disquisitions with shy methodological rigor were barred. Likewise, Argentine literature, including government reports and compositions, was considered when peer-reviewed sources were scarce (DeBar et al., 2021). Ultimately, 20 to 30 high-quality sources were named for in-depth analysis to maintain a robust and up-to-date validation base. 

Analysis of Evidence

An analysis of the 20 named peer-reviewed papers handed precious perceptivity into the effectiveness of CBT and motivational canvassing in treating opioid dependence. The studies employed various methodologies, including randomized controlled trials and regular reviews, to estimate issues analogous to reduced readmission rates and better internal health. Pivotal findings revealed that both CBT and motivational canvassing were effective in managing opioid dependence and co-occurring psychiatric conditions analogous to anxiety and depression (Buckner et al., 2023; McHugh et al., 2024). Despite these promising issues, gaps remained in understanding the long-term goods of these interventions, as well as their effectiveness across different demographic groups. Likewise, the disquisition emphasized the need to consider cost-effectiveness and the delivery modality of these antidotes in different healthcare settings (MacLean et al., 2024; Olmstead et al., 2020). 

Literature Search and Analysis Table

Section Details
Literature Search Databases PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library.
Search terms Opioid dependence , CBT, motivational canvassing , readmission rates.
Boolean drivers( AND OR) and pollutants for publication date and peer- reviewed papers.
Inclusion Criteria Studies on adult cases with substance use diseases, fastening on CBT and motivational canvassing interventions.
Outcomes: Reduced readmission rates.
Exclusion Criteria Non-English studies, exploration of children, and papers with poor methodological quality.
Sources and Analysis Peer-reviewed studies, systematic reviews, gray literature (government reports, dissertations).
20 peer- reviewed papers anatomized for applicability and methodological rigor.
linked gaps in long- term treatment issues and demographic-specific findings.

NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search

Borsari, B., Li, Y., Tighe, J., Manuel, J. K., Gökbayrak, N. S., Delucchi, K., Morasco, B. J., Abadjian, L., Cohen, B. E., Baxley, C., & Seal, K. H. (2021). The study conducted a pilot trial that combined collaborative care with motivational interviewing to lower opioid risk and enhance chronic pain management. Addiction, 116(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15401

Buckner, J. D., Scherzer, C. R., Crapanzano, K. A., & Morris, P. E. (2023). Group cognitive behavioral therapy for substance use disorders among psychiatric inpatients in a medically underserved area: An intervention for opioid misuse. Public Health Reports, 138(1_suppl), 90S–95S. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549231170219

Buckner, J. D., Walukevich-Dienst, K., Crapanzano, K. A., Tucker, R. P., & Tynes, L. L. (2021). The study focused on brief motivational interviewing-based interventions for opioid misuse in hospital settings. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 7(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000280

DeBar, L., Mayhew, M., Benes, L., Bonifay, A., Deyo, R. A., Elder, C. R., Keefe, F. J., Leo, M. C., McMullen, C., Owen-Smith, A., Smith, D. H., Trinacty, C. M., & Vollmer, W. M. (2021). The study focuses on a primary care-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for long-term opioid users with chronic pain. Annals of Internal Medicine, 175(1). https://doi.org/10.7326/m21-1436

NURS FPX 9902 Assessment 2 Literature Search

Hah, J. M., Trafton, J. A., Narasimhan, B., Krishnamurthy, P., Hilmoe, H., Sharifzadeh, Y., Huddleston, J. I., Amanatullah, D., Maloney, W. J., Goodman, S., Carroll, I., & Mackey, S. C. (2020). Efficacy of motivational interviewing and guided opioid tapering support for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery (MI-Opioid Taper): A prospective, assessor-blind, randomized controlled pilot trial. EClinicalMedicine, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100596

References

Amin, M., Reza Davasaz Irani, F., Fattahi, P., & Pakseresht, S. (2023). goods of brief cognitive behavioral remedy on internal health in substance-related complaints The study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05413-4

Bertholet, N., Meli, S., Palfai, T. P., Cheng, D. M., Alford, D. P., Bernstein, J., Samet, J. H., Lloyd-Travaglini, C., & Saitz, R. (2020). Netting and brief intervention for lower-trouble drug use in primary care A birdman randomized trial. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 213, 108001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108001

Step-by-Step Guide

  1. Define Your Hunt Strategy Start by explaining the regular approach you took. Your notes are a great resource for this, mentioning vital rudiments like 
    • Databases: List the specific databases you used, such as PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO, and explain why they were applicable for your content. 
    • Keywords and motorists State the keywords and MeSH terms you used (opioid dependence, CBT, motivational canvassing) and how you combined them with Boolean drivers (AND, OR) to upgrade your hunt. 
    • Addition/Rejection Criteria Detail the criteria you used to handpick your papers. This section is a vital step that shows your hunt was rigorous and focused. For illustration, your notes mention including only peer-reviewed studies on grown-ups and banning non-English papers. 
  2. anatomize and synthesize the validation This section is the core of your assessment. You need to go beyond simply listing what each composition set up and produce a cohesive narrative. 
    • crucial findings Your notes correctly identify that both CBT and motivational canvassing are effective for treating opioid dependence and co-occurring internal health issues. 
    • Identify the Gaps A critical part of designing a DNP is to relate the gaps in current substantiation. Your notes do this well by pointing out the need for further disquisition on 
      • pivotal findings Your notes rightly identify that both CBT and motivational canvassing are effective for treating opioid dependence and co-occurring internal health issues. 
      • Identify the Gaps A critical part of designing a DNP is to relate the gaps in current validation. Your notes do this well by pointing out the need for further exploration in 
      • The long-term salutary goods of these interventions require further exploration. 
      • Your notes effectively further probe on the long-term goods of these interventions, as well as their effectiveness across different demographic groups. 
      • The study also focuses on the cost-effectiveness and delivery modalities of these interventions. 
  3. Connect to Your Design Always link your findings back to design. For the case, you could explain that while the confirmation supports your proposed intervention, the linked gaps highlight areas where your design can contribute new, precious perceptivity. 
  4. Use the Table Format The table you’ve handed in is an excellent way to epitomize your hunt and analysis. Fill it out with the details you’ve formerly gathered to provide a clear, at-a-glance overview of your work. 
  5. Conclude with a Synthesis End your document with a strong summary. Reiterate the effectiveness of your proposed interventions predicated on the literature you have reviewed. Emphasize that your design will be rooted in the validation gathered to address the specific knowledge gaps you have linked, thereby contributing to the overall body of knowledge.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Integrity Note

Use this example for learning and structure only. Do not submit as your own work.
We are an independent resource and are not affiliated with any university.

“I paid the service to write my research paper.” They wrote an excellent paper with a lot of research and correct citations. “Great excellent work!”

Order ID # 00889

BSN - Capella University

Jonathan Nicole

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : BSN, MSN

Jessica Walker

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : MSN, DNP

Denis Peterson

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Experience : 10+ Years in Nursing.
Specialization : DNP, PSY

How it Works

We provide services to registered nurses who are taking classes toward their BSN or MSN degrees.

You cannot copy content of this page

Nursing Papers Help even with a 3-hour deadline!

Get Any Assessment For Free

Verification is required to avoid bots.