BUS FPX 4127 Assessment 3

Introduction

Evidence-based management is of paramount importance in health organizations, particularly regarding the delivery of high-quality patient care. It is obligatory to obtain current and accurate information while conducting research, particularly within the patient’s waiting room settings, as it has a direct impact on the patient’s satisfaction and organizational effectiveness. Hospital administrators who disregard the issue of waiting time can face a loss in the rate of reimbursement since the patient’s feedback, particularly in the event of a waiting time of over 15 minutes, influences reimbursement. The three sources related to this research are from Sez Journal, NCBI, and Villanova University.

Validity and Credibility

Source #1: Sage Journals

The Rishi magazines are the world’s fifth-largest journal publishers, offering a platform for scholarly research. In June 2016, the title of the patient in the orthopedic clinic by Critez, Winters, and Podovitz, “Time,” with the title, offers a comprehensive analysis based on the new patient survey data obtained in an orthopedic clinic between June 2011 and October 2014.

Source #2: Villanova University

Villanova University, which is a private research university located in Pennsylvania, provided a site for a study by a group of researchers working for Australian scholars. The research applied Six Sigma methods in huge hospital environments in order to enhance patient treatment protocols in the emergency department. Six Sigma, driven by the mission of maximizing efficiency and eliminating defects, makes the patient’s safety and the enhancement of the patients in the hospitals possible. Lean control and Six Sigma technique integration led to a dramatic rise in the flow of patients, which prompted the time to save time from the profession of the hospital’s bed. Due to this, hospitals saved money, which facilitated investment in sophisticated bed monitoring software.

Source #3: National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)

U.S. NCBI, a subsidiary of the National Library of Medicine, serves as a renowned colleague evaluation source. An online article titled “The Waiting Room Weight,” dated February 5, 2014, analyzes the potential to transform the waiting room experiences into opportunities for the patient. Strategies discussed include employing the waiting time for the contract goal setting, for completion of the questionnaire, and for remodeling of the waiting room in order to enhance the patient and medical satisfaction. Structured tools enabled the patient to extensively discuss the concerns and maximize counseling efficiency.

Conclusion

Lastly, one needs to utilize colleague review and credible sources to access vital information regarding health care. Both NCBI and Sage magazines are known for colleagues’ finished content. Although the research by the University of Villanova does not have a peer review, it offers insightful information regarding the practice of health care. Evidence-based management has revolutionized delivery processes for health services considerably.

BUS FPX 4127 Assessment 3: Researching a Clinical Issue 

Croits, T., Winters, B., and Pedovitz, D. (2016). The effect of waiting time on the patient’s satisfaction in the orthopedic clinic. Journal of Patient Experience, 3 (2), 39-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373516652253