BUS FPX 4122 Assessment 2

Politics and Health Care Economics

Influence and History of Healthcare Reform

Political health reform in the U.S. has been a hotly debated topic for twenty years, primarily stemming from excessive costs of health care and reduced payment rates from health insurance companies. Most reforms have the potential to enhance the US health care system and borrow from nations like Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom. The aim of this letter is to evaluate the present US reforms, compare them with other health systems, and recommend effective measures for significant improvement in the United States.

While reviewing reforms of health services in the United States, it is necessary to consider the first reforms undertaken in the early 1990s. The objective of these reforms was to replace and mend some parts of the new agreement and reforms that came after the Great Depression. The Clinton administration’s reform plan called for the transformation of mixed public-private health care in the direction of universal coverage with the employer contribution to the insurance premium. Though, it was met with the reality of implementation, mirroring the constant struggle between reform leaders and popular movements (Oberlandar, 2007; Hoffman, 2003).

BUS FPX 4122 Assessment 2:Analysis of Non-U.S. Healthcare Models

Prior to a discussion of the US health reform in 2014, it is handy to examine the health care system in some other nation for comparison purposes. Canada has a single-payer insurance system that gives universal health services, with doctors working with one insurance agency, U.S. The same is comparable with Medicare, but the Canadian system also includes limits, like prices and stern government control over few private options, resulting in the rationing of medical services (Lehar, 2004).

Or else, Germany’s health system presents a dual alternative with private insurance entities and state welfare-type insurance companies. Its system is built around personal contributions and autonomy and offers private insurance on the grounds of income region. By supporting competition and facilitating access to options in the private sector, Germany’s model has ensured broad coverage and minimizes waiting time; possibly efficient health reforms (Germany, 2016) are a role model for theirs.

BUS FPX 4122 Assessment 2 Politics and Health Care Economics 

Current Healthcare Reform

Since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2014, the US health care system has infected a three-time system consisting of private insurance, state exchange programs, and state insurance plans like Medicare and Medicaid. Although the intention of ACA was to increase coverage and reduce costs, the impact is open to inquiry. Experts indicate that the legislation favored the health care system by introducing new patients, prescription users, and customers, but its long-term impacts need to be evaluated more (Abelson, 2014).

In comparison to the model of the health system for other nations, the United States provides the system with greater access to private insurance and encourages a pluralistic market. Yet, this strategy hastens competition among insurance entities and bars potentially universal coverage. In contrast, German blends guarantee models, like models, only general access without depending on state financing (Chenier, 2002).

Conclusion

Lastly, the state insurance models pose difficulties when political unrest and cost are considered. Reds involving competition in the private sector as well as individual contributions offer favorable options for health services. Meanwhile, as America continues to adapt its health care system, what is learned through both successes and failures in other nations can provide insight into subsequent reforms and ultimately aim toward accessible and resilient health services for everyone.