BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 1

Introduction

Part 1: Research Problem and Purpose Statements

Throughout this paper, the background of the disquisition will be illustrated, supported by literature. Subsequently, validation-predicated information will be applied to support the development of the disquisition problem. Following this, a problem statement will be formulated predicated on applicable literature, and ultimately, a purpose statement will be cooked, supported by literature. 

Background and Evidence

The chosen disquisition focus within sanatorium-acquired conditions (HAC) is the circumstance of foreign objects remaining in the body post-surgery. Despite strict safety protocols in operating apartments, crimes persist, affecting the successful completion of surgeries. Pyrek (2017) notes an estimated twenty-eight million surgeries are performed annually in the United States, with four to six thousand cases reported for retained surgical outfits. Despite medical advancements, retained surgical items (RSIs) pose a case challenge (Fencl, 2016). 

The Joint Commission (TJC) defines unintended retention of foreign objects (URFOs), or RSIs, as the unintentional leaving of surgical instruments inside a patient post-surgery (Fenner, 2019). This can lead to infections or death, causing physical and emotional detriment to cases distributed by TJC as guard events (Fenner, 2019). In response, TJC introduced the Universal Protocol in 2004 to palliate analogous incidents, though its effectiveness remains debated (Kim et al., 2015). Despite efforts, crimes persist, leading to questions regarding sanatorium credibility and patient safety (Liber, 2018). 

Still, these incidents can serve as openings for hospitals to enhance safety practices and assure cases of continual improvement (Birolini, Rasslan & Utiyama, 2016). 

Part 2: Problem Statement

Annually, thousands of surgeries in the United States report incidents of retained surgical outfits post-surgery, indicating a significant problem affecting patient issues. The problem statement highlights the recurring issue of surgical objects remaining within cases’ bodies, supported by literature and numerical data. 

Part 3: Purpose Statement

To palliate circumstances of retained surgical particulars, surgical departments should adopt the Five Ways to Safer Surgery from the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA). This study aims to apply effective safety measures to reduce surgical instrument retention and posterior detriment to cases. The purpose statement aligns with the study’s focus on safety measures, supported by applicable literature. 

BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Research Problem and Purpose Statements

Fenner, K. (2019). The Joint Commission’s Hospital National Patient Safety pretensions for 2018 Compass Clinical Consulting. Compass Clinical Consulting. https://www.compassclinical.com/the-joint-commission-national-patient-safety-goals-for-2018/

Kim, F., da Silva, R., Gustafson, D., Nogueira, L., Harlin, T., & Paul, D. L. (2015). Current issues in patient safety in surgery. BMC. 9, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0067-4

Liber, M. (2018). Surgical bloodsuckers left outside the woman for six times. CNN Health. https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/21/health/surgical-sponges-left-inside-woman-study/index.html

BHA FPX 4010 Assessment 1 Research Problem and Purpose Statements

Pyrek, K. (2017). Precluding retained surgical particulars is a team effort and an infection control moment. https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/patient-safety/preventing-retained-surgical-itemsteam-effort